Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Quit Smoking - It is Your Health

Cigarette butts150If you smoke, you know how difficult it is to Quit Smoking. How many times have you said to yourself or to your friends or family that you are going to quit smoking today or tomorrow or even next week with no such luck, or I’m going to join a stop smoking program and never do. People do not understand that nicotine is a drug and it is addictive and its not easy to quit. After all the times of saying you will quit and you can’t its because the addictions remains.


Lets take a closer look at the effects of. Smoking has an injurious effect on most all of ones body parts. Its not so hard to believe but the biggest risk is to your lungs as they are affected most adversely and whats funny is, the most addicted smokers know the risk of lung cancer and continue to smoke.


But there is much more than one might know, smoking can adversely affect your hair, brain, eyes, nose, skin, teeth, mouth and throat, hands, esophagus, respiratory system and lungs, cardiovascular system, liver, abdomen, kidneys and bladder, male reproductive system, bones, blood, immune system, and your legs and feet.


So, how important is your health to you? Do you really want to Stop Smoking? There are so many different programs on the market today, what works for one may not work for another, and based on reasons for wanting to quit. Is it out of demand, illness or do you just have the pure desire to quit?


When searching for a quit smoking program, you will want to look at the pros and cons and warnings associated with each program, do they use medication, meditation or what is the primary methodology to guide you to break your addiction.


You will be amazed at how many diverse stop smoking programs are out on the market today. The big question is, do you really honestly want to quit? If you answered yes, then you and only you need to get a handle on your addiction. Find the program that feels best for you and go for it. It only takes a short period of time to break the chemical dependency to nicotine, it’s the habits that is hard, or when you are stressed or happy or other triggers that make you want to smoke. Have a great attitude, and confidence in yourself that you can quit this horrible addiction and you will do it.


Have much success with your quit smoking program, it may become stressful at times, but stay strong and know that your health is worth it. Do it Now, because your LIFE depends on it.


Nanette Hughston is a freelance writer from southern US region with a Bachelors Degree in Finance.

Additional resources:
http://smokingnomore.blogspot.com


http://stopsmokingprogram.blogspot.com


http://smokingdanger.blogspot.com


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Nanette_Hughston
http://EzineArticles.com/?Quit-Smoking—It-is-Your-Health&id=221711


 


 



Quit Smoking - It is Your Health

Monday, March 10, 2014

E-cigarettes: fresh air or smoke and mirrors?


e cigarettes On the edge of the SoHo neighborhood downtown, The Henley Vaporium is an intimate hipster hangout with overstuffed chairs, exposed brick, friendly counter help — but no booze.


Instead, the proprietors are peddling e-cigarettes, along with bottles of liquid nicotine ready to be plucked from behind a wooden bar and turned into flavorful vapor for a lung hit with a kick that is intended to simulate traditional smoking. A hint of banana nut bread e-juice lingered in the air one recent afternoon as patrons gathered around a low table to chat and vape, or sidled up to the inviting bar for help from a knowledgeable “vapologist.”


Places like The Henley are a rarity, even in New York. But “vaping,” itself, has had astonishing growth — in just eight years or so, the number of enthusiasts around the world has grown from a few thousand to millions. Believed by some to be the invention of a Chinese pharmacist, vaping now has its own YouTube gurus, trade associations, lobbyists, online forums and vapefests for meet-ups centered on what enthusiasts consider a safer alternative to the “analog,” their name for tobacco cigarettes.


Vaping may be safer — there are differing opinions — but it isn’t necessarily cheap.


Will Hopkins, a 21-year-old dog walker in black leather jacket and skull ring, visits Henley four or five times a week. He smoked a pack of full-strength Marlboros a day for eight years, until he took up vaping. The same goes for his buddy, 20-year-old photographer Will Gallagher, who has been vaping for two years and is fond of his brass mod, a cylindrical device that’s larger than a cigarette and decorated with a tiger and Chinese lettering.


“I think both of us have poured in probably a little over a thousand” dollars, Gallagher said of their equipment. “I like the exclusivity of vaping. I like to keep changing up my stuff.”


The Wills are into rebuilding tanks and rewiring coils, scouting new e-liquid flavors and adjusting their devices, which can cost up to $300 at Henley, to allow for more vapor, more flavor. But the co-owners of Henley count older smokers among their clientele as well.


E-cigarettes are usually made of metal parts combined with plastic or glass and come in a variety of shapes and sizes. They heat the liquid nicotine solution, creating vapor that quickly dissipates when exhaled. The vapor looks like tobacco smoke and can feel like tobacco smoke when taken into the lungs at varying strengths, from no nicotine up to 24 milligrams or more.


In 2006, sellers of all things vape worked primarily online or via kiosks in shopping malls. Now there are more than 250 brands and devices that can cost mere dollars for a case of “cigalikes,” which resemble the real thing, to a gold-and-diamond unit the size of a fountain pen that was reportedly made for a Russian oil tycoon and cost about $900,000.


Whether vaping is cheaper than a cigarette habit is up to how much is spent on equipment and liquids and how often one vapes. A 15-milliliter bottle of liquid at Henley can go for $12 and may be roughly the equivalent of four packs of cigarettes, depending on the strength of both liquid and leaf cigarette, among other factors like how many puffs a smoker takes in. Rechargeable devices require batteries — another expense — and a starter kit for reuse that comes with a device can run around $66.


By comparison, the cost of a 20-cigarette pack of regular cigarettes can range from about $5 to about $15, depending on state tax and the type of location where they’re purchased.


The Food and Drug Administration has not yet stepped in to regulate e-cigs — and their amped-up marketing — but that’s likely to happen as some cities and states have already moved to ban public use the way they do tobacco.


Critics believe e-cigs may serve as a tobacco gateway for uninitiated young people. “It may be smoking e-cigarettes, but it’s still smoking,” said U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat who was one of four senators to fire off a scathing letter to NBC and the Hollywood Foreign Press Association after a spoof on e-cigs aired during the Golden Globes in January.


Proponents argue that vaping isn’t only safe but is helping people quit smoking. The Henley has a white “wall of doom,” where it lists in big black letters the numerous tars and chemicals found in tobacco cigarettes, but absent in e-cig use if one is careful about the liquids purchased.


“What’s so beautiful about this product is we can take people from a high level of nicotine down to zero, down to nothing, so they’re just vaping basically water and flavoring,” said Henley co-owner Talia Eisenberg.


She scoffs at the notion that child-friendly flavors of e-liquids — Watermelon Wave and Frozen Lime Drop, for instance — were created to lure teens. And she rejects the idea that e-cig companies should be banned from advertising on TV, as tobacco companies were more than 40 years ago.



While e-liquids and vaping supplies lack oversight and long-term research, they are readily available to all ages online, and at gas stations, bodegas and many drug stores. But Henley doesn’t serve those under 18. Would it make more sense to help people give up nicotine — an addictive substance — altogether?


“Sure, but how’s that workin’ for the country so far? How are they doin’ with that? We’re talking in terms of serious harm reduction,” said Eisenberg’s business partner, Peter Denholtz. His mother died of lung cancer two years ago; he himself smoked cigarettes for 36 years, but has been vaping for four years.


Some vapers, like Hopkins and Gallagher, find fun in tinkering with the paraphernalia. Denholtz likens them to older DIY enthusiasts who once whiled away their time on Heathkits, those all-inclusive boxes of parts that could be turned into TV receivers, amateur radios or stereo speakers.


“There’s a whole subculture coming up. They’re very into all of the different devices. They rewire and rebuild and use different materials for drawing up the juice. It’s unbelievable what they’ve turned it into,” he said.


Denholtz and others said vaping, to many, is merely a less harmful activity than tobacco smoking that duplicates the most pleasurable aspects and offers a communal feel like hookah use and cigar bars.


Xavier Armand, 25, has been vaping for a little more than three years and owns an advertising and marketing firm that is helping Henley put together a “liquid of the month club,” along the lines of mail-order fruit of the month.


“I always kind of knew smoking was bad for me. My mom was a smoker, but I was never going to look into the patch or the gum or anything,” Armand said. “At the end of the day, the best part about smoking is the smoke part. And that oral fixation is kind of a big thing as well. I consider my agency the 2014 version of ‘Mad Men.’ We all sit around there and instead of smoking cigarettes everyone is smoking e-cigs.”


Much as movie stars made tobacco smoking seem glamorous in the 1930s and ’40s, celebrities have helped fuel interest in vaping.


At the Golden Globes, Leonardo DiCaprio was shown vaping away in the audience. The actor told The Associated Press recently he vapes to “relieve the stress of life.”


Other celebrities have signed on as paid e-cig endorsers, including co-host of “The View,” Jenny McCarthy, and actor Stephen Dorff, both of whom push Blu, a big player in e-cigs that was recently bought by Big Tobacco’s Lorillard.


Dorff, who took up smoking 20 years ago, stuck to Blu’s talking points in a recent interview. He described how vaping offers him the freedom to smoke where regular cigarettes are frowned upon.


But wouldn’t his loved ones like to see him quit nicotine for good?


“Ah, probably yeah,” laughed Dorff, “but there’s a lot of bad things in the world, you know. The one thing that I’ve always enjoyed is smoking. I consider myself a smoker.”


By LEANNE ITALIE  in Yahoo News




E-cigarettes: fresh air or smoke and mirrors?

Friday, March 7, 2014

No smoking, anywhere







Smoking CessationThe dangers of secondhand smoke are making it increasingly inconvenient for smokers to get their fix.


January marked six years since Illinois became smoke-free. The initial ban, which limited the use of cigarettes in indoor public places, aimed to both decrease the prevalence of smoking, and to protect non-smokers from the dangers of secondhand smoke.


But simply banning smoking indoors isn’t enough shield us from secondhand smoke, health officials are saying.


Two bills to further limit smoking are making their way through the Illinois General Assembly. One aims to ban smoking in vehicles with minors. The other proposes to ban smoking on any public college campus in Illinois.


Most adults agree smoking should be banned in cars with kids, according to a study by the University of Michigan last year. Yet only five states actually have a ban. That is why Sen. Ira Silverstein, D-Chicago, has proposed a bill that would ban smoking in a motor vehicle containing any passengers under age 18.


The legislation states that police may not stop a vehicle only for smoking in the car with a child. Rather, police would be able to issue a citation if they had pulled the vehicle over for another violation. Violators would be fined up to $100.


Kathy Drea, vice president of advocacy of the Illinois chapter of the American Lung Association, told the Illinois Senate’s public health committee that even low levels of secondhand smoke are harmful. She said the concentration of smoke in a vehicle is up to 60 times greater than in a smoky bar.


But similar legislation has failed in the past, including a bill last year that proposed only banning smoking in vehicles with children under the age of 13, and a bill in 2007 that did make it to the House floor but received only 18 votes in favor of it and 91 “no” votes.


Another suggested smoking ban, the Smoke-Free Campus Act, would ban smoking on all public college campuses in Illinois. The Illinois House Higher Education Committee voted 9-3 in February in support of the ban.


Some college campuses in Illinois already ban smoking, such as the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Southern Illinois University Carbondale. While the state’s 2008 ban applies to all indoor areas on campuses, in those that do allow smoking, it is sometimes permitted in the quad or parking lots. If the bill passes, smoking would be banned everywhere on campus property with the exception of moving vehicles that are traveling through campus. It would be up to individual colleges to decide how to enforce the ban.


In January, a U.S. Surgeon General’s report added several conditions to the list of health problems that can be caused by secondhand smoke, including diabetes, colon and liver cancer, and strokes for non-smokers.


“We don’t know everything about smoking,” Drea said. “It needs to be taken very seriously.”


A purpose of both bills is to limit the amount of exposure to secondhand smoke, but Drea said the ban also aims to cause university employees and students to quit smoking.


These proposed restrictions come after the Chicago City Council approved an ordinance in January to ban the use of electronic cigarettes indoors and the February announcement that CVS Caremark will no longer be selling tobacco products. Additionally, cigarette and tobacco prices have gone up over recent years in Illinois as a result of sin taxes put in place by the General Assembly.


As locations to buy and smoke cigarettes decrease over time, the question lingers: is smoking becoming taboo?


According to the Illinois Department of Public Health, rates have declined. While about 25 percent of adults Illinoisans smoked in 1996, only about 16.9 percent smoked in 2010. People are still smoking. They’re just running out of places to do it.


Higher Education committee member Rep. Robert Pritchard, R-Hinckley, who voted in support of the campus ban bill, pointed out such a ban may cause smokers to go off campus to get their fix.


“When I travel around in public buildings and I see people smoking, they’re doing that even at 10 below,” he said.


Contact Lauren P. Duncan at intern@illinoistimes.com.








No smoking, anywhere

Thursday, March 6, 2014

5 Things to Know About E-Cigarettes





PHOTO: E-Cigarettes On The Rise


Los Angeles is the latest city to outlaw e-cigarette smoking in some public places.


The L.A. City Council voted 14-0 in favor of the “vaping” ban, following in the footsteps of New York City and Chicago.


The electronic cigarette was invented in the 1960s, but it didn’t really take off until a decade ago. The Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association now estimates that roughly 4 million Americans use the battery-powered cigs.


Here’s a look at the e-smoke trend: the good, the bad and the unknown.







What are e-cigarettes?


E-cigarettes are battery operated nicotine inhalers that consist of a rechargeable lithium battery, a cartridge called a cartomizer and an LED that lights up at the end when you puff on the e-cigarette to simulate the burn of a tobacco cigarette. The cartomizer is filled with an e-liquid that typically contains the chemical propylene glycol along with nicotine, flavoring and other additives.


The device works much like a miniature version of the smoke machines that operate behind rock bands. When you “vape” — that’s the term for puffing on an e-cig — a heating element boils the e-liquid until it produces a vapor. A device creates the same amount of vapor no matter how hard you puff until the battery or e-liquid runs down.







How much do they cost?


Starter kits usually run between $30 and $100. The estimated cost of replacement cartridges is about $600, compared with the more than $1,000 a year it costs to feed a pack-a-day tobacco cigarette habit, according to the Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association. Discount coupons and promotional codes are available online.





Are e-cigarettes regulated?


The decision in a 2011 federal court case gives the Food and Drug Administration the authority to regulate e-smokes under existing tobacco laws rather than as a medication or medical device, presumably because they deliver nicotine, which is derived from tobacco. The agency has hinted it will begin to regulate e-smokes as soon as this year but so far, the only action the agency has taken is issuing a letter in 2010 to electronic cigarette distributors warning them to cease making various unsubstantiated marketing claims.


For now, the devices remain uncontrolled by any governmental agency, a fact that worries experts like Erika Seward, the assistant vice president of national advocacy for the American Lung Association.


“With e-cigarettes, we see a new product within the same industry — tobacco — using the same old tactics to glamorize their products,” she said. “They use candy and fruit flavors to hook kids, they make implied health claims to encourage smokers to switch to their product instead of quitting all together, and they sponsor research to use that as a front for their claims.”


Thomas Kiklas, co-owner of e-cigarette maker inLife and co-founder of the Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association, countered that the device performs the same essential function as a tobacco cigarette but with far fewer toxins. He said he would welcome any independent study of the products to prove how safe they are compared to traditional smokes.


The number of e-smokers is expected to quadruple in the next few years as smokers move away from the centuries old tobacco cigarette so there is certainly no lack of subjects,” he said.







What are the health risks of vaping?


The jury is out. The phenomenon of vaping is so new that science has barely had a chance to catch up on questions of safety, but some initial small studies have begun to highlight the pros and cons.


The most widely publicized study into the safety of e-cigarettes was done when researchers analyzed two leading brands and concluded the devices did contain trace elements of hazardous compounds, including a chemical which is the main ingredient found in antifreeze. But Kiklas, whose brand of e-cigarettes were not included in the study, pointed out that the FDA report found nine contaminates versus the 11,000 contained in a tobacco cigarette and noted that the level of toxicity was shown to be far lower than those of tobacco cigarettes.


However, Seward said because e-cigarettes remain unregulated, it’s impossible to draw conclusions about all the brands based on an analysis of two.


“To say they are all safe because a few have been shown to contain fewer toxins is troubling,” she said. “We also don’t know how harmful trace levels can be.”


Thomas Glynn, the director of science and trends at the American Cancer Society, said there were always risks when one inhaled anything other than fresh, clean air, but he said there was a great likelihood that e-cigarettes would prove considerably less harmful than traditional smokes, at least in the short term.


“As for long-term effects, we don’t know what happens when you breathe the vapor into the lungs regularly,” Glynn said. “No one knows the answer to that.”







Do e-cigarettes help tobacco smokers quit?


Because they preserve the hand-to-mouth ritual of smoking, Kiklas said e-cigarettes might help transform a smoker’s harmful tobacco habits to a potentially less harmful e-smoking habit. As of yet, though, little evidence exists to support this theory.


In a first of its kind study published last week in the medical journal Lancet, researchers compared e-cigarettes to nicotine patches and other smoking cessation methods and found them statistically comparable in helping smokers quit over a six-month period. For this reason, Glynn said he viewed the devices as promising though probably no magic bullet. For now, FDA regulations forbid e-cigarette marketers from touting their devices as a way to kick the habit.


Seward said many of her worries center on e-cigarettes being a gateway to smoking, given that many popular brands come in flavors and colors that seem designed to appeal to a younger generation of smokers.


“We’re concerned about the potential for kids to start a lifetime of nicotine use by starting with e-cigarettes,” she said.


Though the National Association of Attorneys General today called on the FDA to immediately regulate the sale and advertising of electronic cigarettes, there were no federal age restrictions to prevent kids from obtaining e-cigarettes. Most e-cigarette companies voluntarily do not sell to minors yet vaping among young people is on the rise.


A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study found nearly 1.8 million young people had tried e-cigarettes and the number of U.S. middle and high school students e-smokers doubled between 2011 and 2012.


A version of this story previously ran on ABCNews.com.





Wednesday, March 5, 2014

LA moves to ban e-cigarettes, joining growing list of cities

e-cig_display_paris.jpg




The Los Angeles City Council voted on Tuesday to ban the use of electronic cigarettes, also known as “vaping,” from restaurants, bars, nightclubs and other public spaces in the nation’s second-largest city.


A spokeswoman for Mayor Eric Garcetti confirmed to Reuters that he would sign the measure into law in the coming days.


When he does, Los Angeles will join a growing list of cities, including New York, Boston and Chicago, that restrict the use of e-cigarettes, which are battery-powered cartridges filled with liquid nicotine that creates an inhalable vapor when heated.


At stake is the future of an industry that some analysts believe will eventually overtake the $80 billion-a-year tobacco business.


Public health experts fear that vaping, which has recently gained popularity among teens and young adults, may serve as a gateway to smoking for the uninitiated.


Critics also point to potential harm posed from second-hand vapor from e-cigarettes, saying too little is known about the effects of the chemicals contained in the cartridges.


“We have an obligation to protect the workforce from the effects of secondhand aerosol exhaled by people who choose to ‘vape’ on e-cigarettes,” said City Council member Mitch O’Farrell, who co-sponsored the proposal.


“We also have a responsibility to protect our youth and everyone else in public places from the carcinogens found in the ultra-fine particles in e-cigarette aerosol,” he said.


The proposal was opposed by the makers of e-cigarettes, who pitch their product as a safer alternative to smoking traditional cigarettes and say there is no evidence that second-hand vape smoke is harmful. Advocates of e-cigarettes also say they can help smokers kick the habit.


FDA MAY WEIGH IN


The Los Angeles ban differs from restrictions in other major cities in that it was amended to allow vaping in lounges and e-cigarette stores and for filming or theatrical purposes.


“Although we believe the final decision was made in the absence of credible science, it was a more reasonable and sensible approach than the original proposal,” NJOY, the largest independent maker of e-cigarettes, said in a written statement.


“NJOY remains concerned, however, that banning e-cigarette use in public places could deter current tobacco smokers from using the products and thus disserves public health,” the company said.


The City Council action comes as the U.S. government is contemplating further regulations at the national level.


The Food and Drug Administration has already proposed a rule that would bring e-cigarettes under its jurisdiction and could potentially require companies to register and pay fees, list the ingredients in their products, obtain approval for new products and restrict online sales and marketing to children.


A law passed in 2009 gave the FDA the authority to regulate cigarettes, smokeless tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco.


It also gave the agency the power to deem other tobacco products to be within its jurisdiction, but it must first issue a rule to that effect.


E-cigarette companies believe they should be exempt from the full spectrum of regulations, saying that would stifle innovation, damage small business and hurt consumers trying to quit smoking.


Tobacco company Lorillard Inc, the owner of the blu e-cigarette brand, is the dominant player in the field, followed by privately held NJOY and LOGIC Technology. The three account for an estimated 80 percent of the market.


From Reuters






LA moves to ban e-cigarettes, joining growing list of cities

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

E-cigarette skeptics unnecessarily alarmed by water vapor

e cigarettesAs if resurrected from the 1970s, smoking advertisements have been springing up nationwide in the form of televised commercials. But these ads aren’t for the traditional tobacco cigarette; instead the e-cigarette is rising to fame.


One chemical that particularly alarms the public seems to be nicotine, which isn’t as notably harmful as other components of a tobacco cigarette; its most dangerous quality is its addictiveness, but it has minimal effects on health. Taking all this into consideration, it simply seems that people are over-reacting when they demonize the e-cig, especially when it is trying to replace its much deadlier cousin.Unlike the tobacco cigarette, which contains hundreds of chemical ingredients, the e-cigarette contains hardly any chemicals at all. The e-cig instead consists mostly of distilled water, nicotine and artificial flavoring. Opponents of the e-cigarette, however, claim that they have found traces of formaldehyde, benzene and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the vapor emissions. Even if these chemicals are there, they exist in minimal quantities. So why is everyone freaking out about e-cigs when the chemicals allegedly found in them are so few you can count them on both hands? The dangers of the e-cigarette pale in comparison to dangers of a real cigarette, which contains over 600 ingredients (like arsenic, lead and tar) and emits 4,000 chemicals when burned.


Though the e-cig is much healthier than regular cigarettes, there are arguments that because e-cigarettes are being advertised, they are making the act of smoking cigarettes look cool again. Well, first off, e-cig commercials are not in any way promotional of real cigarettes. In fact, in the most well-known e-cig commercials, celebrities tout the Blu e-cig as a healthier and better choice than tobacco cigarettes. Stephen Dorff declares the e-cig as a “smarter alternative” to real cigarettes after his 20 years of smoking tobacco, and celebrity Jenny McCarthy opens her e-cig promotion with “I love being single, but here’s what I don’t like — a kiss that tastes like an ashtray.” Both of these celebrities list personal disadvantages to smoking real cigarettes.


Yes, these celebrities do look edgy as they breathe clouds of water vapor, but the purpose of these ads is to make the e-cig look cool; they are marketing themselves as better than real cigarettes. These e-cig commercials are also appearing alongside the well-recognized Ugly Truth commercials, which show everyday citizens reacting to anti-tobacco statements (for instance, the cowboy singing the catchy “You don’t always die from tobacco” tune through a hole in his throat). These ads popping up on the same television channel are not making tobacco cigarettes look good.


Another concern springs up about whether e-cigs will be a gateway to real cigarettes. However, a 2012 Center for Disease Control and Prevention study on tobacco product use among high school students showed that 14 percent were reported to have tried cigarettes while 2.8 percent were reported to have tried e-cigs. So, if anything, people should be more concerned that high school students are inhaling tobacco and toxins into their lungs, not that they might be trying out water vapor instead.


CNN reports that the number of e-cig experimenters has doubled since then, but this doesn’t seem like it should be a cause for alarm if high school students are choosing e-cigs over tobacco cigarettes, since according to the CDC, “current cigarette smoking among middle school and high school youth declined between 2000 and 2011.” Would you rather your child was breathing tobacco smoke or water vapor?


Obviously, not smoking is the healthiest choice, but we are far from banning all tobacco products. E-cigs were originally developed as a tool to help current smokers switch to a healthier alternative. And they are doing better than any gum or patch out there, as they’ve been shown in studies to help a slightly larger percent of smokers quit, including one where 7 percent of smokers quit after six months. True, they have not brought a huge number of people away from tobacco cigarettes, but they are still doing better than their predecessors and can continue to produce good results. Introducing e-cigarettes to current smokers is not a bad thing; it’s a step toward a healthier and less-polluted society.


Several over-reactors seem to be demanding that the FDA ban e-cigs; this is startling because it makes no sense to make a healthier alternative to smoking less available than real, harmful cigarettes. Even UC campuses, who recently banned all tobacco products, are denying the e-cigarette access to academic grounds. It is understandable to be wary, since there are still studies that have yet to be done and are some unanswered questions circling the product, but the overwhelming evidence is that e-cigs are a much smarter alternative to tobacco cigarettes.


So, if you smoke, it’s not a bad idea to switch to smoking e-cigs instead. It’s essentially just nicotine and distilled water, and emulates the taste of a real cigarette, but without the guarantee of lung damage. If you have to smoke something, I am definitely in favor of saying, “Out with the tobacco cigarette, and in with the e-cig!”


Written by 



E-cigarette skeptics unnecessarily alarmed by water vapor

Monday, March 3, 2014

Jacob Sullum on e-cigarettes: Sowing confusion among anti-smoking activists


You might think people concerned about the health effects of smoking would welcome an alternative that involves neither tobacco nor combustion and is therefore much less hazardous. Think again.

You might think people concerned about the health effects of smoking would welcome an alternative that involves neither tobacco nor combustion and is therefore much less hazardous. Think again.





“E-cigarettes have taken us back 50 years,” according to the headline over a commentary that National Jewish Health, a medical centre in Denver, recently paid to place on the op-ed page of The New York Times. The essay — co-authored by David Tinkelman and Amy Lukowski, who are in charge of the hospital’s “health initiatives,” including its tobacco-cessation program — never substantiates that claim, which is typical of e-cigarette critics who see a public-health menace where they should see a way of reducing tobacco-related disease and death.


You might think people concerned about the health effects of smoking would welcome an alternative that involves neither tobacco nor combustion and is therefore much less hazardous. But with some notable exceptions, anti-smoking activists and public-health officials have been mostly hostile to electronic cigarettes, which deliver nicotine in a propylene glycol vapour. This puzzling resistance seems to be driven by emotion rather than science or logic.


Tinkelman and Lukowski concede that “e-cigarette vapor contains far fewer toxic chemicals and carcinogens than does tobacco smoke” and that “if e-cigarettes are used to wean individuals off tobacco or to significantly reduce the amount smoked per day, this is a good result.” But they worry that “if e-cigarettes used by non-smokers produce nicotine addiction and smoking habits that lead to new tobacco use, e-cigarettes are causing harm.” Judging from their headline, Tinkelman and Lukowski think that harm not only threatens to outweigh the health benefits of replacing smoking with vaping but could even reverse half a century of progress against tobacco-related disease, giving us smoking rates similar to those in the early 1960s, when most American men and a third of women smoked — compared to about 22% and 17%, respectively, today.


Despite Tinkelman and Lukowski’s over-the-top fears, there is no evidence that e-cigarettes are serving as a gateway to the real thing. They cite survey data indicating that “e-cigarette use among middle and high school students from 2011 to 2012 doubled to 1.8 million users,” adding that “nearly 160,000 of those adolescents do not use tobacco, highlighting the danger e-cigarettes present.” Another way of putting it: Just 7% of teenagers had ever tried e-cigarettes as of 2012, and 91% of them were smokers. Far from alarming, that fact suggests some young smokers may end up switching to vaping, thereby dramatically reducing the health risks they face. That would be “a good result,” as Tinkelman and Lukowski acknowledge.





Jacob Sullum on e-cigarettes: Sowing confusion among anti-smoking activists